When it comes to active vs. passive management strategies in our portfolio construction – we use both. It’s a “horses for courses” approach. 

When do we use an ETF?

Fundamentally, we use an ETF where we cannot find a manager that we believe can offer, over time, a sustainable advantage in performance, net of fees, in the market which we want exposure to. 

Oftentimes, this occurs because the underlying market is highly efficient, and after accounting for manager fees, the active manager tends to underperform compared to the available passive alternatives.

One of the big megatrends over the past 20 years has been the sustained rise of Passive Management for the construction of investment portfolios and diminishing the traditional hold that Active Management has had. 

A manager is deemed “active” if they have discretion (inside the fund’s rules and disclosed mandate) to buy and sell securities/assets. Active strategies usually rely on managers' research, insights and analytical skills to strive to outperform their chosen market….net of fees.  

Passive investing strategies seek to replicate the performance of a chosen market index, usually via an Exchange Traded Fund (ETF) i.e. the ASX 200. If the market price of the index moves in any way, the price of the ETF instantaneously does the same.  

Australian, US, and European equities responded positively to Trump's election and hopes on stimulative Chinese economic policies. We have neutral expectations of Australia and still see, despite value, challenges in the Eurozone. On Emerging markets, we remain defensive, property outlook remains neutral with future directions of interest rate dictating fortunes. We remain constructive on private equity, infrastructure, gold, and private credit. Short Bonds are favoured whilst the long end we see little value. Cash is preferred to retain optionality.

It all begins with an idea.

It all begins with an idea.

It all begins with an idea.